RORATE CÆLI: Rome-SSPX: Declaration of the General Chapter of the Society of Saint Pius X sent to the Holy See

RORATE CÆLI: Rome-SSPX: Declaration of the General Chapter of the Society of Saint Pius X sent to the Holy See.

Rorate Caeli has published the declaration the General Chapter of the Society of Saint Pius X has sent to Rome.  It looks like the reconciliation between Rome and the SSPX is not going to take place anytime soon.  The declaration also says that before a canonical solution is agreed to, an extraordinary chapter of the SSPX will be convened.  Part of the declaration is below.

We wish to express our gratitude to each and every member of our Society: priests, brothers, sisters, third order members; to the religious communities close to us and also to our dear faithful, for their constant dedication and for their fervent prayers on the occasion of this Chapter, marked by frank exchanges of views and by a very fruitful common work. Every sacrifice and pain accepted with generosity has contributed to overcome the difficulties which the Society has encountered in recent times. We have recovered our profound unity in its essential mission: to preserve and defend the Catholic Faith, to form good priests, and to strive towards the restoration of Christendom. We have determined and approved the necessary conditions for an eventual canonical normalization. We have decided that, in that case, an extraordinary Chapter with deliberative vote will be convened beforehand.

Okay, my take on this:

1.  A canonical recognition was about to take place.  The SSPX Superior General, Bishop Bernard Fellay, was preparing the Society for this recognition.

2.  But… Something happened during the June 13th meeting between Bishop Fellay and Cardinal William Levada, who at that time was head of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith.  From statements by Bishop Fellay and others, it seems that Rome was changing the terms for a canonical resolution at the last minute, in a way that Bishop Fellay could not agree to.  It would have torn the Society apart.

3.  The Society of Saint Pius X was almost torn apart anyway.  The SSPX has four bishops.  Bishop Fellay is the Superior General.  He is in charge.  But there was a large part of the SSPX, including the other three bishops, who want doctrinal differences between the SSPX and Rome fixed before an official practical agreement with Rome, and canonical recognition.

4.  I am sympathetic to those who want the doctrinal differences bridged first.  With the confusion caused by the ambiguity in some of the Council documents, and the crisis in the Church in the aftermath of the Council, I fully understand those that want clear, concise statements that restate traditional Catholic doctrine, and clear up any confusion in the Council documents.  I agree with Bishop Athanasius Schneider that a Syllabus of Errors in regards to Vatican II is necessary.  The Syllabus would say Vatican II means this, and not that.

5.  There are those within the Church, who are officially recognized, that prefer ambiguity and bad interpretations of Vatican II.  Note that it is not my style to criticize bishops, so I don’t.  But not every bishop in the Church is a good guy.

6.  There are some people within the SSPX, who post on the web at least, that seems to think that only those in the SSPX or other traditionalist groups are good guys.  That is not true.  The Church has a lot of heroes.  That includes people within the Traditional groups, people that exclusively attend the Novus Ordo, diocesan bishops, etc.  I love my own bishop, Daniel Jenky.  He is one of the more courageous bishops out there, at least within the United States.  And there are many others.  There are very many good priests, and a lot of wonderful laymen who exclusively attend the ordinary form of the Roman Rite.

7.  I will keep in my prayers the SSPX, the Society’s leaders and priests, and the laymen who attend Society chapels.  May Our Lord use the work of the Society contribute to the restoration of the Church.  I want to include in a special way my CCD teacher from the SSPX chapel I attended as a child, who has gone to her eternal reward.  May God watch over her.

8.  I still think that the work of the Society would be more fruitful with an official canonical position in the Church.  But it doesn’t make sense to “charge in” in a way that rips the Society apart.  I do not wish in any way for the destruction of the Society (there are those who do).

9.  In the end everything is in God’s hands.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Catholic, SSPX and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to RORATE CÆLI: Rome-SSPX: Declaration of the General Chapter of the Society of Saint Pius X sent to the Holy See

  1. I have to admit that I haven’t really been following this very closely but what you wrote about is interesting and how the issue unfolds will affect the Church as a whole. I’ll need to become more informed. And yes, everything is in God’s hands.

  2. SSPX COMMUNIQUE INDICATES THEY ARE WILLING TO ACCEPT A COUNCIL WITHOUT THE VISIBLE DEAD PROBLEM
    Communique (1) indicates invincible ignorance, implicit desire, seeds of the Word are not ‘exceptions’.

    With no ‘exceptions’ in Vatican Council II the Council supports the Syllabus of Errors and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

    The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) communique should unite their priests and bishops since for the first time ever the tarmac and runway has been prepared for a flight in a new direction- towards a traditional Vatican Council II.

    If they have stumbled upon a traditional Vatican Council II all the SSPX bishops and priests should be united and happy with this event.It’s the liberals in Rome who should be sweating.The communique will unite all traditionalists including those in the Fr. Leonard Feeney camp.

    The communique says outside the church there is no salvation ‘we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation’ (the old SSPX position) and ‘nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation’ ( the new clarification).

    This is a shift from Bishop Richard Williamson and Fr. Francois Laisney’s position on every one needing to enter the Church except for those in …

    So when the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales states every one needs to enter the Church except for those saved with the ‘seeds of the Word’ etc. the SSPX would say that we acknowledge that a non Catholic could be saved with the seeds of the Word etc but the seeds of the Word is not an exception. There are no exceptions. Since theoretically and practically we do not know anyone saved with the seeds of the Word.There are no visible-dead.

    The SSPX would be using Vatican Council II to negate the English bishops’ error on their website. They would be correcting the bishops on the bishops’ turf, Vatican Council II.

    Everything has been changed and over time the message will reverberate, at some places uncomfortably.

    It was a simple communique, one small line, a little theological observation and its has put the SSPX in the driving seat.

    Now when the Archbishop of Boston website tells us that Nostra Aetate has changed Church teaching the communique reminds us that we do not know any exception -saved, a non Catholic who is a ‘good and holy’ (NA).There are no visible-dead who are ‘good and holy’ and saved.

    The SSPX can no more be ‘in schism’ since there is only interpretation of Vatican Council II and it is theirs!
    -Lionel Andrades

    1.

    we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation…-SSPX Chapter Communique. July 19,2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s